<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building Credibility in the Video Industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.videohive.net/general/building-credibility-in-the-video-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.videohive.net/general/building-credibility-in-the-video-industry/</link>
	<description>The VideoHive Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Loay Emad</title>
		<link>http://blog.videohive.net/general/building-credibility-in-the-video-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-2340</link>
		<dc:creator>Loay Emad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 06:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.videohive.net/?p=1078#comment-2340</guid>
		<description>Really great article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really great article</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrevorG</title>
		<link>http://blog.videohive.net/general/building-credibility-in-the-video-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-2319</link>
		<dc:creator>TrevorG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.videohive.net/?p=1078#comment-2319</guid>
		<description>Awesome and extremely informative entry! Thanks for the words of wisdom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome and extremely informative entry! Thanks for the words of wisdom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Rogers</title>
		<link>http://blog.videohive.net/general/building-credibility-in-the-video-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-2318</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.videohive.net/?p=1078#comment-2318</guid>
		<description>This was a great article. Thanks so much for your contributions.
I&#039;m going to pass this along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a great article. Thanks so much for your contributions.<br />
I&#8217;m going to pass this along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Kopriva</title>
		<link>http://blog.videohive.net/general/building-credibility-in-the-video-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-2310</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Kopriva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 04:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.videohive.net/?p=1078#comment-2310</guid>
		<description>I think that the biggest mistake that a lot of people make when sharing information (e.g., posting tutorials) is that they post quantity and not quality. A related issue is that they create &quot;tutorials&quot; that show what they&#039;re into at the moment, not filling a gap in the existing information that really teaches what other people want or need to learn. I have seen sooooo many videos that show a shoddy approach to the same result, time after time. What I want to see is someone taking a deliberate, well-thought-out approach to teaching one focused concept or technique that no one else has shown well.

I guess that I&#039;m saying that there&#039;s a danger to getting your name out there if your name ends up being associated with half-baked and amateur work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the biggest mistake that a lot of people make when sharing information (e.g., posting tutorials) is that they post quantity and not quality. A related issue is that they create &#8220;tutorials&#8221; that show what they&#8217;re into at the moment, not filling a gap in the existing information that really teaches what other people want or need to learn. I have seen sooooo many videos that show a shoddy approach to the same result, time after time. What I want to see is someone taking a deliberate, well-thought-out approach to teaching one focused concept or technique that no one else has shown well.</p>
<p>I guess that I&#8217;m saying that there&#8217;s a danger to getting your name out there if your name ends up being associated with half-baked and amateur work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

